Talk:Glossary - Revision history

Cbv: commented

2006-09-02T13:34:20Z

commented

Madleser: comment edited

2006-09-02T12:54:27Z

comment edited

Madleser: commented

2006-09-02T12:44:43Z

commented

Cbv: commented

2006-09-02T12:19:00Z

commented

Madleser: commented

2006-09-02T11:42:12Z

commented

Cbv: commented

2006-09-02T11:33:06Z

commented

Madleser: /* necessary? */ commented

2006-09-02T11:00:18Z

necessary?: commented

Cbv at 10:57, 2 September 2006

2006-09-02T10:57:01Z

Madleser: necessary?

2006-09-02T10:39:55Z

necessary?

Comrade at 19:36, 14 November 2005

2005-11-14T19:36:50Z

New page

There may be a call to mention both Instance and Class variables due to the fundamental different roles they play in class-instance style of object oriented programming. Additionally, they're implemented in fairly wildly different ways.
<pre>-Peter</pre>

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 2 September 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Mh. Table of Contents? Besides, using the glossary is already slower that being redirected and scolling down. First you have to click the glossary link, press strg+f to find what you're looking for and then click again. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]		Mh. Table of Contents? Besides, using the glossary is already slower that being redirected and scolling down. First you have to click the glossary link, press strg+f to find what you're looking for and then click again. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]
		+
		+	Good point. Well then, go ahead. [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 2 September 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]		Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]

−	Mh. Table of Contents? [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]	+	Mh. Table of Contents? Besides, using the glossary is already slower that being redirected and scolling down. First you have to click the glossary link, press strg+f to find what you're looking for and then click again. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 2 September 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]		Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]
		+
		+	Mh. Table of Contents? [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 2 September 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Uhm, that's why I was questioning the need for a glossary. Redirecting synonyms (e.g. "Anonymous Object" then points to "Object") and using the search form would be quicker if you want a quick definition for something. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]		Uhm, that's why I was questioning the need for a glossary. Redirecting synonyms (e.g. "Anonymous Object" then points to "Object") and using the search form would be quicker if you want a quick definition for something. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]
		+
		+	Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 2 September 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Quicker access, think of it as a "reference book" [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]		Quicker access, think of it as a "reference book" [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]
		+
		+	Uhm, that's why I was questioning the need for a glossary. Redirecting synonyms (e.g. "Anonymous Object" then points to "Object") and using the search form would be quicker if you want a quick definition for something. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 2 September 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:

	And why is that :o? [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]		And why is that :o? [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]
		+
		+	Quicker access, think of it as a "reference book" [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 2 September 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Yes, I'm all in favour for keeping the glossary [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]		Yes, I'm all in favour for keeping the glossary [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]
		+
		+	And why is that :o? [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 2 September 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Is this page really necessary? Synonyms could be redirected and users/devs can use the search function to the left if they're looking for a definition. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]		Is this page really necessary? Synonyms could be redirected and users/devs can use the search function to the left if they're looking for a definition. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]
		+
		+	Yes, I'm all in favour for keeping the glossary [[User:Cbv\|cbv]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 2 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There may be a call to mention both Instance and Class variables due to the fundamental different roles they play in class-instance style of object oriented programming. Additionally, they're implemented in fairly wildly different ways.		There may be a call to mention both Instance and Class variables due to the fundamental different roles they play in class-instance style of object oriented programming. Additionally, they're implemented in fairly wildly different ways.
	<pre>-Peter</pre>		<pre>-Peter</pre>
		+
		+	== necessary? ==
		+
		+	Is this page really necessary? Synonyms could be redirected and users/devs can use the search function to the left if they're looking for a definition. [[User:Madleser\|Madleser]]