Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
(commented) |
(commented) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv|cbv]] | Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv|cbv]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mh. Table of Contents? [[User:Madleser|Madleser]] | ||
Revision as of 12:44, 2 September 2006
There may be a call to mention both Instance and Class variables due to the fundamental different roles they play in class-instance style of object oriented programming. Additionally, they're implemented in fairly wildly different ways.
-Peter
necessary?
Is this page really necessary? Synonyms could be redirected and users/devs can use the search function to the left if they're looking for a definition. Madleser
Yes, I'm all in favour for keeping the glossary cbv
And why is that :o? Madleser
Quicker access, think of it as a "reference book" cbv
Uhm, that's why I was questioning the need for a glossary. Redirecting synonyms (e.g. "Anonymous Object" then points to "Object") and using the search form would be quicker if you want a quick definition for something. Madleser
Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. cbv
Mh. Table of Contents? Madleser