Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
(commented) |
(comment edited) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv|cbv]] | Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. [[User:Cbv|cbv]] | ||
− | Mh. Table of Contents? [[User:Madleser|Madleser]] | + | Mh. Table of Contents? Besides, using the glossary is already slower that being redirected and scolling down. First you have to click the glossary link, press strg+f to find what you're looking for and then click again. [[User:Madleser|Madleser]] |
Revision as of 12:54, 2 September 2006
There may be a call to mention both Instance and Class variables due to the fundamental different roles they play in class-instance style of object oriented programming. Additionally, they're implemented in fairly wildly different ways.
-Peter
necessary?
Is this page really necessary? Synonyms could be redirected and users/devs can use the search function to the left if they're looking for a definition. Madleser
Yes, I'm all in favour for keeping the glossary cbv
And why is that :o? Madleser
Quicker access, think of it as a "reference book" cbv
Uhm, that's why I was questioning the need for a glossary. Redirecting synonyms (e.g. "Anonymous Object" then points to "Object") and using the search form would be quicker if you want a quick definition for something. Madleser
Oh, you mean using Redirects instead of anchors? Uhm, I used anchors on purpose. If a page is longer you then wouldn't have to scroll down to the section you actually are interested in. cbv
Mh. Table of Contents? Besides, using the glossary is already slower that being redirected and scolling down. First you have to click the glossary link, press strg+f to find what you're looking for and then click again. Madleser